<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ministry of Skepticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ministryofskepticism.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com</link>
	<description>Home of the Looking Glass Logic Society and the Skeptical Action Squad</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 09:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Not Changing MY Mind&#8230; by bigfrozenhead</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2010/07/14/not-changing-my-mind/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>bigfrozenhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 20:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=220#comment-36</guid>
		<description>You beat me to this one... maybe because I have a head cold. Reminds me of a thread on EconLog where Arnold Kling was asking if there was ever an economic study that made people change their minds about something. He also offered up this:

"What causes people to change their minds? On this blog, I have argued that people do not change their minds on ideological issues. I have argued that econometric regression results typically do not change people's minds. Why is that?

1. Changing your mind could mean acknowledging a loss of status. If you are an academic, and you achieved status because of your articulation of theory X, then you will not give up on theory X, even if years later much of the profession has switched to theory Y. As Max Planck put it, "Science progresses one funeral at a time."

2. Changing your mind could mean loss of group identity. I suppose I could use the unkindest cut example. But let me stick with economic beliefs. If your think of yourself as belonging to a group of conservative Republicans, you probably are going to resist any analysis that promotes Keynesian economics."

Source: http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/10/changing_people.html

I think the WHY of people not changing their minds fascinates me even more than the fact that they do it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You beat me to this one&#8230; maybe because I have a head cold. Reminds me of a thread on EconLog where Arnold Kling was asking if there was ever an economic study that made people change their minds about something. He also offered up this:</p>
<p>&#8220;What causes people to change their minds? On this blog, I have argued that people do not change their minds on ideological issues. I have argued that econometric regression results typically do not change people&#8217;s minds. Why is that?</p>
<p>1. Changing your mind could mean acknowledging a loss of status. If you are an academic, and you achieved status because of your articulation of theory X, then you will not give up on theory X, even if years later much of the profession has switched to theory Y. As Max Planck put it, &#8220;Science progresses one funeral at a time.&#8221;</p>
<p>2. Changing your mind could mean loss of group identity. I suppose I could use the unkindest cut example. But let me stick with economic beliefs. If your think of yourself as belonging to a group of conservative Republicans, you probably are going to resist any analysis that promotes Keynesian economics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/10/changing_people.html" rel="nofollow">http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/10/changing_people.html</a></p>
<p>I think the WHY of people not changing their minds fascinates me even more than the fact that they do it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I&#8217;m Moving To North Korea by devnull</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2010/06/07/im-moving-to-north-korea/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>devnull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=218#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  I've got some fruit juice bubbling away on my kitchen counter at the moment.  Through my Arcane Knowledge of the Secrets of the Ancients, I am transforming it into a beverage which makes me think I'm smarter and more beautiful too*!  It makes me feel so young that with enough of it I act like a teenager**!

* Warning: side effects may include making an idiot of yourself in public.
** Warning: teenagers are idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  I&#8217;ve got some fruit juice bubbling away on my kitchen counter at the moment.  Through my Arcane Knowledge of the Secrets of the Ancients, I am transforming it into a beverage which makes me think I&#8217;m smarter and more beautiful too*!  It makes me feel so young that with enough of it I act like a teenager**!</p>
<p>* Warning: side effects may include making an idiot of yourself in public.<br />
** Warning: teenagers are idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scientia [Non] Est Potentia? by devnull</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2010/05/28/scientia-non-est-potentia/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>devnull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=214#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I thought the most telling line of the Arstechnica article was:

"Regardless of whether the information presented confirmed or contradicted the students' existing beliefs, all of them came away from the reading with their beliefs strengthened."

Note that this does not say that one side irrationally held to their beliefs in the face of evidence - it says that _both_ sides did.  Makes you wonder what the experimenters original hypothesis was, and whether they considered the evidence which they collected to support that hypothesis or not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the most telling line of the Arstechnica article was:</p>
<p>&#8220;Regardless of whether the information presented confirmed or contradicted the students&#8217; existing beliefs, all of them came away from the reading with their beliefs strengthened.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note that this does not say that one side irrationally held to their beliefs in the face of evidence - it says that _both_ sides did.  Makes you wonder what the experimenters original hypothesis was, and whether they considered the evidence which they collected to support that hypothesis or not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everybody Draw Mohammed Day by admin</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2010/05/20/everybody-draw-mohammed-day/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=211#comment-32</guid>
		<description>First there was a mountain, then there was no mountain, then there was a mountain.

Or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First there was a mountain, then there was no mountain, then there was a mountain.</p>
<p>Or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Everybody Draw Mohammed Day by devnull</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2010/05/20/everybody-draw-mohammed-day/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>devnull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 21:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=211#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Soooooo... the mountain came to Mohammed, I guess?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soooooo&#8230; the mountain came to Mohammed, I guess?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy Birthday, Hubble! by devnull</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2010/04/24/happy-birthday-hubble/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>devnull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 01:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=203#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Just wow.  I'm still working on grasping how big a "three--light-year-tall pillar of gas" really is.  I'll get back to you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Just wow.  I&#8217;m still working on grasping how big a &#8220;three&#8211;light-year-tall pillar of gas&#8221; really is.  I&#8217;ll get back to you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adventures In Titular Redundancy by devnull</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2010/02/23/adventures-in-titular-redundancy/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>devnull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=188#comment-29</guid>
		<description>The first rule of Publishing Club is... Know Thy Audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first rule of Publishing Club is&#8230; Know Thy Audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zombies at an all-time low! by harry</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2009/08/11/zombies-at-an-all-time-low/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=140#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I worked out how we can cure the world of homeopathy.

Step 1: get all homeopathists in one room. Get an equal number of skeptics.  Line them up opposite each other.  give each an empty glass.

Step 2: Open a big tin of poison. Put a fatal dose of poison water into each glass in front of a homeopathist.

Step 4: Using homeopathic dilution make a super dilute poison solution.  Put this solution into the glasses in front of the skeptics.

Each side now think the other has the most deadly solution in front of them.

Drink.

End of problem.
See who dies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked out how we can cure the world of homeopathy.</p>
<p>Step 1: get all homeopathists in one room. Get an equal number of skeptics.  Line them up opposite each other.  give each an empty glass.</p>
<p>Step 2: Open a big tin of poison. Put a fatal dose of poison water into each glass in front of a homeopathist.</p>
<p>Step 4: Using homeopathic dilution make a super dilute poison solution.  Put this solution into the glasses in front of the skeptics.</p>
<p>Each side now think the other has the most deadly solution in front of them.</p>
<p>Drink.</p>
<p>End of problem.<br />
See who dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Zombies at an all-time low! by harry</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2009/08/11/zombies-at-an-all-time-low/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=140#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I worked out how we can cure the world of homeopathy.

Step 1: get all homeopathists in one room. Get an equal number of skeptics.  Line them up opposite each other.  give each an empty glass.

Step 2: Open a big tin of poison. Put a fatal dose of poison water into each glass in front of a homeopathist.

Step 4: Using homeopathic dilution make a super dilute poison solution.  Put this solution into the glasses in front of the skeptics.

Each side now think the other has the most illness causing solution in front of them.

Drink.

End of problem.
See who dies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked out how we can cure the world of homeopathy.</p>
<p>Step 1: get all homeopathists in one room. Get an equal number of skeptics.  Line them up opposite each other.  give each an empty glass.</p>
<p>Step 2: Open a big tin of poison. Put a fatal dose of poison water into each glass in front of a homeopathist.</p>
<p>Step 4: Using homeopathic dilution make a super dilute poison solution.  Put this solution into the glasses in front of the skeptics.</p>
<p>Each side now think the other has the most illness causing solution in front of them.</p>
<p>Drink.</p>
<p>End of problem.<br />
See who dies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Philosophers and God&#8217;s Lawyers by devnull</title>
		<link>http://ministryofskepticism.com/2009/06/12/philosophers-and-gods-lawyers/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>devnull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ministryofskepticism.com/?p=49#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Heya Hazman; just saw this because I had failed to put the comments feed in my RSS reader...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya Hazman; just saw this because I had failed to put the comments feed in my RSS reader&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

